diff --git a/learning-records/0005-accusative-adjective-endings-7-of-10.md b/learning-records/0005-accusative-adjective-endings-7-of-10.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c2c93d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/learning-records/0005-accusative-adjective-endings-7-of-10.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Accusative Adjective Endings: 7/10 — One Clear Misconception Found + +Missed 3 of 10 on the lesson 5 drill. Two of the three errors point to the same misconception rather than +random slips. + +**The declension-type mixup (Q6, Q9):** Both misses used the ending *-es* after a der-word — *das alte Auto* +answered as *altes*, and *den teuren Kostenvoranschlag* answered as *teures*. *-es* is a mixed/strong +declension ending (neuter, used only when nothing else marks the noun as neuter). It never appears in weak +declension, where the only two options are *-e* and *-en* — the der-word (*das*, *den*) already marks gender +and case, so the adjective doesn't need to repeat the signal. + +**The gender miss (Q5):** *eine nette E-Mail* was answered as *einen netten*, treating *E-Mail* as masculine. +This is the same slip flagged in the diagnostic session (0003-diagnostic-session-gaps.md) — *E-Mail* is a +memorize-only noun that has now failed twice under production pressure despite the correction being given +each time. + +**Implications:** The next adjective-endings pass should call out the weak-declension rule explicitly — +"after der/die/das, the only two endings that exist are -e and -en; -es is never one of them" — as its own +line, not just something implied by the table. *E-Mail*'s gender needs deliberate spaced repetition (flashcard +style); two incidental exposures haven't fixed it, so it likely needs a short, focused noun-gender refresh +revisiting the lesson 2 gap rather than more incidental exposure in unrelated lessons. diff --git a/lessons/0005-accusative-adjective-endings.html b/lessons/0005-accusative-adjective-endings.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a1506e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lessons/0005-accusative-adjective-endings.html @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ + + +
+ + +Lesson 5 of your German course
+B1.2 · Grammar · ~20 minutes
+ ++ Lesson 3 covered how articles change in the accusative (der → den). Adjectives placed in front of a noun carry their own ending too — and that ending depends on what, if anything, comes before the adjective: a der-word, an ein-word, or nothing at all. This is the source of errors like letzten Samstag, einen neuen Termin — the rule is known, but which ending to reach for isn't automatic yet. +
+ +The article already shows the case, so the adjective ending is minimal.
+Ein-words don't mark masculine nominative or neuter, so the adjective picks up the slack there.
+With nothing in front, the adjective alone has to signal gender and case — it behaves like a der-word.
+Accusative singular only — this is where your errors cluster:
+ +| + | masculine | +feminine | +neuter | +
|---|---|---|---|
| after der-word | +den neuen | +die neue | +das alte | +
| after ein-word | +einen neuen | +eine nette | +ein kaputtes | +
| no article | +frischen (Kaffee) | +frische (Milch) | +kaltes (Wasser) | +
Plural, no article, also stays simple — it takes -e in both nominative and accusative, same as the article die doesn't change:
+ +Each sentence is accusative. Decide what precedes the adjective (der-word, ein-word, or nothing), then pick the ending.
+ + + + + ++