Chris Smith
6704c40bd5
Covers weak/mixed/strong declension for accusative adjectives. Learning record captures the two real misconceptions found: reaching for -es after a der-word (only valid in mixed/strong declension), and E-Mail's gender missed a second time despite an earlier correction.
1.5 KiB
Accusative Adjective Endings: 7/10 — One Clear Misconception Found
Missed 3 of 10 on the lesson 5 drill. Two of the three errors point to the same misconception rather than random slips.
The declension-type mixup (Q6, Q9): Both misses used the ending -es after a der-word — das alte Auto answered as altes, and den teuren Kostenvoranschlag answered as teures. -es is a mixed/strong declension ending (neuter, used only when nothing else marks the noun as neuter). It never appears in weak declension, where the only two options are -e and -en — the der-word (das, den) already marks gender and case, so the adjective doesn't need to repeat the signal.
The gender miss (Q5): eine nette E-Mail was answered as einen netten, treating E-Mail as masculine. This is the same slip flagged in the diagnostic session (0003-diagnostic-session-gaps.md) — E-Mail is a memorize-only noun that has now failed twice under production pressure despite the correction being given each time.
Implications: The next adjective-endings pass should call out the weak-declension rule explicitly — "after der/die/das, the only two endings that exist are -e and -en; -es is never one of them" — as its own line, not just something implied by the table. E-Mail's gender needs deliberate spaced repetition (flashcard style); two incidental exposures haven't fixed it, so it likely needs a short, focused noun-gender refresh revisiting the lesson 2 gap rather than more incidental exposure in unrelated lessons.